<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working with the TiledLayer Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbarnes.com/midlet/tiledlayer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbarnes.com/midlet/tiledlayer/</link>
	<description>Java ME Development and Free Cell Phone Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harishankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dbarnes.com/midlet/tiledlayer/comment-page-1/#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>Harishankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbarnes.com/midlet/tiledlayer/#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>Considering all manufacturers and bugs found in many devices, do you recomend using in-built tile layer or developing a simpler one ourselves. Which one do you think is the best choice when we have to handle many layers at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering all manufacturers and bugs found in many devices, do you recomend using in-built tile layer or developing a simpler one ourselves. Which one do you think is the best choice when we have to handle many layers at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

